|
Government Rulings on Closed Captioning
Closed Captioning -
It's the Law
US FCC
ruling on closed captioning
Canadian ruling on closed captioning
21st Century Communications and Video
Accessibility Act of 2008
Requirements for Closed Captioning in Higher Education
FCC
fining stations over caption lapse
Access to emerging Internet Protocol-based communication and video programming technologies Source: http://www.coataccess.org/node/74 Track the Legislative Progress of H.R. 6320, the "Twenty-first Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2008" H.R.6320 was introduced June 19, 2008 by Reps. Edward J. Markey (D-MA-7) and Heather Wilson (R-NM-1) to ensure that individuals with disabilities have access to emerging Internet Protocol-based communication and video programming technologies in the 21st Century. Cosponsors Text of the Legislation Bill Status and Summary
FCC
fining stations over caption lapse
By Frank Ahrens
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, May 27, 2005; Page E02
For details click on FCC
Fining Stations Over Caption Lapse.
The Federal
Communications Commission has proposed fining three Washington area
television stations for failing to provide adequate closed-caption
information for hearing-impaired viewers during a tornado watch in May
2004.
NBC-owned WRC (Channel 4), ABC affiliate WJLA (Channel 7) and
Fox-owned WTTG (Channel 5) face proposed fines totaling $40,000, the
FCC said yesterday.
As dangerous
thunderstorms and tornado conditions bore down on Washington on May
25, 2004, local weather broadcasters told viewers in certain areas
they should take cover but failed to relay the same information in
closed captions, the FCC reported. Under federal law, broadcasters are
required to provide emergency information in both audio and visual
form, whether by closed captioning or a similar presentation.
One viewer wrote to the FCC: "[Fox] cut into the screen during
'American Idol' for news about the weather. From this visual (with no
captions), it look[ed] like the bad weather might be in Maryland. I
was totally confused."
The FCC investigation found that, at 9:02 p.m., WRC meteorologist Bob
Ryan told viewers to move away from windows and toward a bathroom or
basement if they sensed high winds but failed to provide the
information in any visual form.
An $8,000 fine is proposed against WJLA, which failed to display
closed-caption information during one storm report. The other stations
each face $16,000 fines because they each failed to provide the closed
captioning during two reports.
The stations can appeal the fines.
Requirements for Closed Captioning in Minnesota Higher Education
Several far-reaching
pieces of state and federal legislation form the guiding framework
for accessibility compliance in a distance education setting. This
body of law includes real-time and delayed captioning of courses
delivered live to students at a distance.
1973 Section 504 of
the Rehabilitation Act (Section 504) -
The section mandates
that the colleges must not discriminate in the recruitment,
admission, or treatment of any students with disabilities and
provide equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from any
services or programs that are offered. Providing aural information
through real-time or live, captioning of distance education meets
the mandate of Section 504.
1990 Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) -
The Office for Civil
Rights (OCR) enforcement of the ADA has focused on three areas:
timeliness of delivery, accuracy of translation, and provision in a
manner and medium appropriate to the significance of the message and
the abilities of the individual with the disability. Live captioning
of courses meets the ADA‟s mandate for “timeliness of delivery.”
1995 Title 5
California Code of Regulations –
Requires post
secondary institutions that receive funding from the State of
California to provide accessibility for distance education courses.
California
Government Code 11135 – Discrimination. California Senate Bill 105
which strengthens compliance regardless of federal funding to “…meet
the protections and prohibitions contained in Section 202 of the
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990” has been incorporated into
California Government Code 11135.
Section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (amended 1998) provides distinct
standards for web accessibility compliance.
For details, click on
http://www.mncdhh.org/news/141/we-waited-to-see-if-the-governor-chose-to-unallot-he-didnt
.
|